by: Elizabeth Currie
On Monday October 31st, 2011 the population of the earth reached 7 billion people. In some people’s minds, that probably sound pretty fantastic, when in actuality it is the exact opposite. The earth surpassed its ideal population long ago. According to a David Pimentel, a professor at Cornell University, the ideal population for the earth is closer to 2 billion, if not slightly less. At the current rate we are going to reach 12 billion within 60 years. I find these numbers absolutely ridiculous! There are way too many people on our earth currently for it to be able to sustain itself for very much longer (in earth years).
On Monday October 31st, 2011 the population of the earth reached 7 billion people. In some people’s minds, that probably sound pretty fantastic, when in actuality it is the exact opposite. The earth surpassed its ideal population long ago. According to a David Pimentel, a professor at Cornell University, the ideal population for the earth is closer to 2 billion, if not slightly less. At the current rate we are going to reach 12 billion within 60 years. I find these numbers absolutely ridiculous! There are way too many people on our earth currently for it to be able to sustain itself for very much longer (in earth years).
If something isn’t done about population control then the future for our children and children’s children doesn’t look to be all that great. Professor Pimentel also suggests that we could get our population down to 2 billion within 100 years if we only each couple has 1.5 children. 1So in no way are you reproducing more children then are currently on the earth. Each couple would have either 1 or 2 children, since you can’t have half of a person. There can’t be any more of this ‘Duggar family situation’ where you can have 19 kids. Those families are the reason we have gotten ourselves into this mess in the first place. And the problem with families that size is that children that come from larger families tend to then have larger families of their own. So each one of those 19 children is probably going to have quite a few children of their own, and it just snowballs from there.
Don’t get me wrong, I understand that sometimes a woman can have multiple births (triplets, quadruplets, etc) and I would not go as far to say that you would have to abort 1 or 2 of the embryos so that you can reach your limit of 2; that would just be unethical. There will be some families that don’t have any children at all so the count of zero children for some couples would even out the average to the 1.5 when there are situations of multiple births. But I think that by and large something does have to be done about population control so that those that have to deal with this situation in the future can at least have a fighting chance to be able to sustain the population.
I don’t think anyone wants to ruin the future for our children. The problem is that most people don’t think about the future, they are more concerned with the present. So, yes, for the current population on the earth we won’t have to worry about the huge issue of sustainability in our lifetime. But your grandchildren and great-grand children will have to. I don’t think it’s something that people are purposefully procrastinating from, but it’s a pretty important issue and the sooner something is done about it the easier it will be to fix it. As well, we are already trying to find more sustainable ways to get our resources. The fishing industry is already hurting greatly. And if we have a problem now, just think what the problems will be 40 or 60 years from now. Something needs to be done now or very soon, otherwise we are going to reach the breaking point and there will be no turning back and reversing once we have reached it. We still have a chance to be more than just a tiny blip in the earth’s life span (which is what we are currently), and I think that we should try our best to stick around as long as we can. In the words of Helen Lovejoy from The Simpson’s, “The Children! Won’t someone please think of the children?”
